WikiLeaks marked the Fourth of July by making it way easier to look through former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails, publishing 1,258 emails that it says the presumptive Democratic nominee sent and received about the Iraq war during her tenure at the top of the U.S. Department of State. The emails had already been made available as part of a much larger release of well over 30,000 emails by the State Department in February of this year as a result of a Freedom of Information request.

The notorious whistleblowing site went ahead and sifted through that data trove, gathering up all the Clinton emails connected to the Iraq War in one tidy bunch and on Independence Day it tweeted out a link to a search of her emails on its site that contained the words: Iraq, Baghdad, Basra and Mosoul.

Great timing with the FBI

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange revealed a few weeks ago that this leak was in the pipeline and went on to remark that his organization had collected enough evidence to lead to an indictment of the presidential aspirant by the FBI.

“We’ve accumulated a lot of material about Hillary Clinton. We could proceed to an indictment,” Assange told Britain’s ITV in an interview he gave last month.

This past weekend, Clinton reportedly spent more than three hours being questioned by the FBI about the private email server she controversially used during her time as Secretary of State but on Tuesday FBI director James Comey revealed that Hillary was off the hook.

Don’t miss the latest news!
Click on the topic you interest most. We'll keep you updated with all the news you shouldn't miss.
Democratic Party

Comey said in a televised press statement at the FBI headquarters that, “Although there is evidence of potential violations, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. We are expressing to [the] Justice [department] our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.”

The British connection

The tweet was also timed to today’s release of Britain’s Chilcot report, which will contain the long-awaited findings of the inquiry commissioned by Sir John Chilcot in 2009 to investigate the circumstances and decision that led the U.K.

into joining the U.S. in the March 2003 invasion of Iraq.

The New York Times has predicted that this highly anticipated report which is expected to thoroughly outline Britain’s involvement in the Iraq war “is likely to be the definitive assessment of a conflict that is widely seen in Britain as the worst foreign policy blunder since the 1956 Suez crisis.”

Don't miss our page on Facebook!
Click to read more