The Statue of Liberty may be at risk from sea level rise, severe weather, and wind-driven storm surges. That’s according to a new report by the United Nations Educational Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) on famous landmarks that may be at risk from climate change. The report was co-published by the Union of Concerned Scientists, a global warming activist group that has invested heavily in promoting climate change anxiety.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Super-storm Sandy strikes

Less than four years ago, Hurricane Sandy swept through the New Jersey and New York area as a Category 1 hurricane and wreaked havoc on Liberty Island and Ellis Island’s low-lying edifices. When it finally made landfall, it was downgraded to a tropical depression. But that was enough to “damage or destroy much of the infrastructure on both islands including electrical, water, sewage, security and telephone systems.”

Though no damage was caused to Lady Liberty or her pedestal, the facilities and areas closest to sea level did experience damage.

Advertisement

Two things converged on that day in October 2012: An unusually high tide and strong, gale-force winds. The last time a strong tropical storm hit the NYC area was in the 1950s. The difference today is that more people and houses are now in areas once uninhabited. And carbon dioxide (CO2) levels were at 350 ppm, and not today's level of 400 ppm. Storms should be increasing, but they aren't.

Hurricanes and storm surges.

The U.S.

Don’t miss the latest news!
Click on the topic you interest most. We'll keep you updated with all the news you shouldn't miss.
Donald Trump

is in a hurricane "drought," meaning we haven’t had a Cat-3 or higher storm reach landfall for 127 months (about 11 years). And computer models, which have been vastly overestimating sea level rise, now forecast lower intensity storms but with higher storm surges. When Sandy struck, it was estimated that sea level rise was about 0.5 meters (1.6 feet) since 1850. That’s approximately three millimeters (0.12 inches) a year, about the same rate since the Earth left the last glaciation 15,000 years ago. Sea level rise goes up and down for a variety of reasons and have differing rates across the globe.

El Nino.

The computer models that many scientists rely on have also been overstating how much climate change the Earth will experience with increased CO2 levels. The same simulations that have predicted catastrophic warming failed to foresee an 18-year-long global warming “hiatus” that was interrupted by the strong, naturally occurring El Niño of 2015 - 2016.

Global Warming or Global Scamming?

The United Nations report, says Elisa Tonda of the Responsible Industry and Value Chains Unit, wants this to be a wake-up call for all governments, businesses, and tourists to “reduce carbon emissions” and to safeguard the world’s most treasured landmarks and “natural resources from the impacts of tourism activities.” They believe that keeping the planet from warming two degrees Celsius from pre-industrial levels will prevent future climate change, but it will be very expensive to implement.

Advertisement

Recently, over 190 nations agreed to reduce CO2 emissions, and the U.S. committed to a 25 to 28 percent reduction by 2025 using the Clean Power Plan (CPP).

Our climate's political future

If elected, presidential nominee Donald Trump (R) said the U.S. would withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement, not give taxpayer dollars to the UN’s green ‘slush’ fund, and kill the CPP. Mr. Trump views the CPP as a meaningless gesture that will cost Americans even more business, thwart much-needed energy jobs, and have little to no impact on the climate.

Advertisement

This belief was reinforced by Obama’s former Department of Energy Assistant Secretary Charles McConnell, who told Congres, “The Clean Power Plan (CPP) has been falsely sold as impactful [sic] environmental regulation when it is really an attempt by our primary federal environmental regulator to take over state and federal regulation of energy.

“What is also clear, scientifically and technically, is that EPA’s plan will not significantly impact global emissions.”

Don't miss our page on Facebook!
Click to read more